Fictional teaching example. No particular organisation or incident is described.
Situation
An operator shows a green report for nightly backups. Asked about restoring the application, files and queue, the team replies, “The backups are there.” The service owner assumes a 30-minute recovery time. Nobody has measured download time, access to encryption keys or whether the stores form a consistent recovered state.
Warning signs
- Monitoring checks that the backup job finished but never reads from the backup.
- The runbook names a tool, not the order of recovery, dependencies or who can approve resuming traffic.
- RPO and RTO describe “the system” although database, files and messages follow separate schedules.
- The last drill used a small old sample and never tested the full user journey.
Consequences
A backup may be unreadable, a key unavailable or restored attachments may not match database records. Even a good backup of one component cannot restore the whole service. A green job status then measures the scheduler, not architectural resilience.
A better decision
- Define what “service restored” means to a user; set RPO and RTO for that journey.
- Check backup retention, integrity, availability and keys when the primary region is unavailable. Restrict access and rehearse in isolation.
- Rehearse the entire runbook on representative data volume: database, files, messages, configuration and routing. Restore the function and run a transactional test.
- Measure achieved targets, record gaps and owners for remediation. Repeat after material changes and periodically verify that recent backups can be read.
A drill consumes time and infrastructure. Skipping it has a cost too; it merely sends the bill at the worst moment.
A backup has value when you can use it to restore the required service within the agreed time.
Discuss this article
Share a constructive observation or an anonymised example. Comments are checked by AI before publication. Uncertain cases go to the moderator.